On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 02:23 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:34 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> I did... the style issues are already there, my patch is not >> >> introducing them. Do you want me to send a separate patch to fix the >> >> existing style issues? >> > >> > Yes, If your inclined to clean up the whole file, or just the >> > surrounding code that would be helpful .. >> >> Nobody seems to like the patch you suggested me to do... did I wasted >> my time doing it? >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/42383 > > Did you get some negative feedback ? I don't see any.. Well: --- And after today's discussion on kernel summit on this topic, I wouldn't expect any maintainer to merge it, sorry :) --- That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication that somebody will pick it up. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
