Hi Matthew, On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Setting polling_delay is useless as passive_delay has priority, > > so the value shown in proc isn't the actual polling delay. It > > also gives the impression to the user that he can change the > > polling interval through proc, while in fact he can't. > > > > Also, unset passive_delay when the forced passive trip point is > > unbound to allow polling to be disabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > I'll look over this - I seem to remember having some reason to set > that, but it escapes me now. Have you had a chance to check this? Cheers, FJP -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
