On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Setting polling_delay is useless as passive_delay has priority, > so the value shown in proc isn't the actual polling delay. It > also gives the impression to the user that he can change the > polling interval through proc, while in fact he can't. > > Also, unset passive_delay when the forced passive trip point is > unbound to allow polling to be disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> I'll look over this - I seem to remember having some reason to set that, but it escapes me now. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
