On Monday 24 August 2009, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:27 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:21:50PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:09 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > I don't agree - the wakeup GPE will generate a standard notify, and the > > > > notification handler has to be at the device or bus layer to handle > > > > device-specific requests. > > > Then we will have duplicate code at each device or bus. > > > > I think that's inevitable, unless the notification infrastructure is > > made more fine grained. > At least we need some check and maybe gpe handling and we need some > "ifdef ACPI" staff at each device or bus. Why would we need that? > There isn't big difference device/bus register a notification handler or > register a .wakeup_event. And .wakeup_event is more simple in device/bus > level. As Matthew said, there is. To make things clear, we're not going to add .wakeup_event(). Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
