On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:27 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:21:50PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:09 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > I don't agree - the wakeup GPE will generate a standard notify, and the > > > notification handler has to be at the device or bus layer to handle > > > device-specific requests. > > Then we will have duplicate code at each device or bus. > > I think that's inevitable, unless the notification infrastructure is > made more fine grained. At least we need some check and maybe gpe handling and we need some "ifdef ACPI" staff at each device or bus. There isn't big difference device/bus register a notification handler or register a .wakeup_event. And .wakeup_event is more simple in device/bus level. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
