On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:42:02AM +0800, yakui_zhao wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 09:21 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Yes. So how do we tell which ordering a machine needs without having a > > blacklist? Windows doesn't. > > If there exists the different behaviour w/o the boot option, maybe it > should be added to the blacklist. > > Maybe there is no such blacklist on windows. Quite. There shouldn't be on Linux. > I verify this problem on windows by using KVM and find that the _PTS > object is called after device suspend in course of hibernate.(No S3 is > supported on KVM). In theory the _PTS is also called after device > suspend in course of suspend. What would it take to fake S3 on KVM enough that we could instrument Windows' behaviour? > But it is strange that suspend/resume can work well on windows XP. > Maybe more registers are saved/restored in course of suspend. But we > can't know what should be saved/restored. Nor can we continue adding machines to a blacklist. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
