Re: [patch]: ACPI: Add the Pansonic CF51 box to the dmi check table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:16:07AM +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:41 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Do we have any idea what's going on here, yet?
> >  Several of the machines 
> > on this blacklist are modern, so it's not a workaround for ancient 
> > hardware.
> Now we have no idea how the behaviour is changed with the boot option.
> In fact the boot option is useful for all the boxes that can't be
> resumed unless it is added. 
> 
> Although the machine is modern, the ACPI 1.0 is followed on this box.
> Without the boot option of "acpi_sleep=old_ordering", it can't be
> resumed from S3 correctly. But after adding the boot option, the box can
> be resumed. 

Yes. So how do we tell which ordering a machine needs without having a 
blacklist? Windows doesn't.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux