On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:26:06AM +0100, Francesco Lattanzio wrote: > It is exactly the same thing, done differently. Now I ask you, should we > put this feature inside some eeepc-specific cpufreq module, or inside > the eeepc-laptop module? Keep in mind that the 1000H model allows me to > combine the effects of both the cpufreq (through Atom SpeedStep feature) > and these ACPI methods. Putting it in eeepc-laptop is probably easier. I'd recommend doing it with cpufreq, but making sure that the transition latency is large enough that ondemand won't try to mess with it. There's actually an interesting question of what to do with making sure performance doesn't bind and push you to a speed you don't want by default. I'll talk to Dave about that. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
