Should maybe this be applied? please review.
--------------------------->8-------------8<------------------------------
When index equals ACPI_NAME_SIZE, that is still one too large.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsnames.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsnames.c
index ae3dc10..232c80c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsnames.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsnames.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ acpi_ns_build_external_path(struct acpi_namespace_node *node,
parent_node = node;
name_buffer[index] = 0;
- while ((index > ACPI_NAME_SIZE) && (parent_node != acpi_gbl_root_node)) {
+ while ((index >= ACPI_NAME_SIZE) && (parent_node != acpi_gbl_root_node)) {
index -= ACPI_NAME_SIZE;
/* Put the name into the buffer */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
