Re: ACPI: S4 disappeared [mmotm 2009-02-10-16-35]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/11/2009 09:51 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/11/2009 01:36 AM, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-02-10-16-35 has been uploaded
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've found out, that S4 disappeared in this release, in comparison to mmotm
> based on 2.6.29-rc2:
> -ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S4 S5)
> +ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S5)
> 
> Any ideas what could have caused this?

I think this one
ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE=n
because
SMP=y
since
 config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE
        def_bool y
-       depends on !SMP || !X86_VOYAGER
+       depends on !SMP

The condition was wrong, ok, anyway it worked. Would
depends on !SMP || EXPERIMENTAL
make sense? The smp is handled in disable_nonboot_cpus manner, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux