Re: [incremental-PATCH-for-Sam's-Review] ACPI: use ccflags-y instead of EXTRA_CFLAGS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:56:15PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > The conversion from ACPI_CFLAGS to ccflags-y is fine.
> > And if acpi really require -Os then this part is also OK -
> > I just did not get *why* acpi needs -Os
> 
> None of ACPI is performance critical and it's rather large, so it was
> defaulted to -Os long before the rest of the kernel. It's not
> a hard requirement, but a generally good idea.

Wrong wording on my part when I wrote "hard requirement".
I should have said "justified requirement" which you with the above
have proved it is.

Thanks,
	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux