On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 17:14 +0000, Tony Vroon wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 10:19 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > I plan to beat the shit out of the hal killswitch support pretty soon. > > AFAIK it still doesn't know about softblock, which is part of the whole > > reason for the rfkill rewrite in 2.6.26 anyway. It also doesn't yet > > (AFAIK) support uevents from killswitches either, which sucks. > > Thanks Dan. > Could you let me know when you've committed this code so I have another > shot at implementing rfkill reporting in fujitsu-laptop? Yeah, though the HAL support will be coded to the kernel rfkill devices, so if the platform or the wifi driver supports the kernel rfkill interface, the HAL bits should work. > P.S. Did you get my e-mail about the Sierra Wireless MC8790? Yes; it's hal-info commit 8912ec2b5d0a221a74156c047b18a26b2d916e13. Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
