On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 02:49:52PM -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: > Well, lo and behold! With a newer version of acpidump, we do get both the RSDT and XSDT and there are indeed two different FADTs. > > Acpidump should post a version number to prevent this kind of thrash in the future. > > The FADT within the RSDT seems much more reasonable. It is a short (rev 1) FADT with no 64-bit register addresses to cause issues. I still suspect the GPE0 block length (0x10) however. Huh. Right, so either Windows ignores the length or uses the length (but not the address) from the X block. The plot thickens. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
