Not even the 32-bit values seem fully correct, however. For example: [05Ch 092 1] GPE0 Block Length : 10 [0DCh 220 12] GPE0 Block : <Generic Address Structure> [0DCh 220 1] Space ID : 01 (SystemIO) [0DDh 221 1] Bit Width : 20 [0DEh 222 1] Bit Offset : 00 [0DFh 223 1] Access Width : 00 [0E0h 224 8] Address : 000000000001F028 For the first block length, I seriously doubt that the machine has (0x10 * 8) = 128 GPEs. The bit width of 0x20 (32 GPEs) sounds more reasonable. >-----Original Message----- >From: Matthew Garrett [mailto:mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:04 PM >To: Moore, Robert >Cc: Koornstra, Reinoud; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Brown, Len; Lin, Ming M >Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc7 acpi error messages > >On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:43:12PM -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: > >> Again, can't tell which one is correct. > >Windows uses the 32-bit values, so they'll be the correct ones. This is >an incredibly prevalent problem and we need to just implement Windows >compatibility here. > >-- >Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
