How is it fixed? ACPI and sensors should be able to live together. If I can't have one without the other, in my opinion, this is a blind spot for both projects. Has anyone brought this up to the kernel ACPI developers to see if they can "unhide" or "expose" the hardware monitoring? As for this laptop, thermal regulating is actually controlled in the hardware: neither ACPI nor sensors/i2c is needed to regulate temperature in the OS level. I just find it odd that i2c/lm_sensors claims to support this chipset yet the answer I get is that the kernel ACPI "hides" them. I'll bring this up to the kernel ACPI developers, but I would like to see this issue resolved. Again, I am willing to test out whatever code necessary to help this process. On Tuesday 18 November 2008 06:20:48 pm lm-sensors wrote: > #2361: i2c and lm_sensors do not work on Slackware 12.1 with kernel > 2.6.27.6 > ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- >- Reporter: ticket | Owner: somebody > Type: defect | Status: closed > Priority: major | Milestone: > Component: sensors | Version: 3.0.3 > Resolution: fixed | Keywords: > ----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- >- Changes (by khali): > > * cc: twinreverb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (added) > * status: new => closed > * resolution: => fixed > * milestone: 3.0.4 => > > Comment: > > I don't see anything wrong here. Most laptops do not have (exposed) > hardware monitoring chips. Thermal regulation is handled by ACPI. -- Very respectfully, Robert Delahunt ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ezekiel 11:19 New King James Version Then I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within them, and take the stony heart out of their flesh, and give them a heart of flesh.... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
