On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 04:27:09PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 10:24 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Why? If there's a FADT entry in the XSDT we might as well use it - all > > the machines I've checked contain valid information in the 32-bit entry > > of the FADT there. > > > do you mean always using FADT1.facs and ignore the FADT.Xfacs in Linux? If the value is below 4GB and uses the same resource type as the legacy value, I don't see why not. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
