On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Tuesday 21 October 2008 16:29:56 Matthew Garrett wrote: > > How? We *know* we're deviating from the behaviour of Windows here. > Matthew, there is no solution to stick to the Windows behaviour. > Even if hundreds of machines are affected, you have still not yet come up with > a generic solution, but try to block the fix. You're the one asserting that Windows behaves in a certain way. I'm asking you to justify that assertion. The information from that test allows us to determine whether a static table is the best we can do or not. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
