On Tuesday 21 October 2008 15:08:36 Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 03:05:33PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > Even if this is not proven, the patchset should still go in to get the > > machines fixed for now and to easily test others, there was enough > > discussion around it. > > What do you mean, "fixed"? They all already work, even if it's in a > suboptimal way. If C-states don't work and do work with a patch. I call the patch a fix. I also call the machine broken (even if it does boot) before and fixed afterwards. I also call a machine broken which takes minutes to boot and fixed as soon as the problem is solved and the machine is booting in a reasonable amount of time. Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
