On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:51:24PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > But *why* is Vista not showing the symptoms? > > I very much doubt anyone ever attempted to run Vista on a R40e or a R50e. > It probably won't work well on the T4x/R51/R52 either, but I haven't tried. I'd be surprised if nobody has done it. The hardware is above the minimum spec. > > values in the table were never caught because, for some reason, Windows > > never used them. The bug is that we're not using the same heuristic as > > Windows. Applying a static list of hardware just results in it being > > likely that we'll never fix that bug. > > I am a bit lost, now. Are you talking about newer ThinkPads with > Vista-capable BIOSes, or the older ones that can't handle it and thus are > only subject to some ACPI access patterns when running Linux? The R40e and R50e have differing values in the RSDT and XSDT tables. Linux uses the values from the XSDT, which apparently results in a system hang whenever you attempt to perform C-state manipulation. Using the RSDT values instead avoids this. Windows works fine, so is clearly using the RSDT values. However, we have no knowledge of what mechanism Windows uses to choose between the two sets of values. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
