On Friday, 17 of October 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 16:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, 16 of October 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > The patches between the above two commits are related with X86. When > > > using git-bisect between the above two commits, we will get the > > > compiling errors(For example: some files don't exist) or the kernel > > > panic. So we can't continue using git-bisect to identify which commit > > > the regression is caused by. > > > > If you test SMP kernels on a non-SMP box, that may be > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568. In which case, please test > > the patch from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568#c46 . > > > Thanks for so quick response. The smp kernel is tested on the non-SMP > box. > After applying the patch in > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568#c46, > the box can be resumed very well on the latest kernel. Thanks for testing. The patch has been posted for mainline inclusion: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122419938208201&w=4 Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
