Re: Suspend/resume regression between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, 17 of October 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 16:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 16 of October 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > >   The patches between the above two commits are related with X86. When
> > > using git-bisect between the above two commits, we will get the
> > > compiling errors(For example: some files don't exist) or the kernel
> > > panic. So we can't continue using git-bisect to identify which commit
> > > the regression is caused by.
> > 
> > If you test SMP kernels on a non-SMP box, that may be
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568.  In which case, please test
> > the patch from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568#c46 .
> > 
> Thanks for so quick response. The smp kernel is tested on the non-SMP
> box.
> After applying the patch in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568#c46, 
> the box can be resumed very well on the latest kernel.

Thanks for testing.

The patch has been posted for mainline inclusion:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122419938208201&w=4

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux