On Thursday, 16 of October 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 10 of October 2008, Zhang Rui wrote: > > > Hi, len, > > > > > > this is the ACPI regression test result based on the latest ACPI test branch. > > > > > > 1. on Acer:(AMD CPU, VIA chipset. 64 bit kernel) > > > When doing S3 test, after pressing the power button, the system > > > reboots instead of resuming. But if S3 is done after S4, the system can > > > resume very well after pressing power button or using the RTC > > > alarm. > > > Note that this is an upstream regression as it can be reproduced on > > > linus' tree. > > > Yakui is investigating this issue. > > > > We had some reports of the second suspend (S3) failure too, where the second > > attempt to suspend to RAM (or to resume from it) failed after a successful > > one. I wonder if that's related. > Some suspend/resume tests are done on one Acer laptop(AMD CPU, VIA > chipset, 64-bit kernel). > The system will be rebooted when pressing power button after the box > enters S3 state. But if S3 is done after doing S4, the system can be > resumed very well after pressing power button.This issue can be > reproduced on the upstream kernel. > > After the further test we can confirm that this is a regression. The > 2.6.26 kernel can work well on this box. But the 2.6.27-rc1 will fail. > > After using the git-bisect it is confirmed that the commit > 736f12bff9d9e7b4e895c64f73b190c8383fc2a1 is good. > >commit 736f12bff9d9e7b4e895c64f73b190c8383fc2a1 > >Author: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue May 27 20:14:51 2008 -0700 > >x86: don't use gdt_page openly. > > And the commit > 55f262391a2365d657a00ed68edd1a51bca66af5 is bad. > >commit 55f262391a2365d657a00ed68edd1a51bca66af5 > >Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> > >Date: Wed Jun 25 17:54:23 2008 -0700 > >x86: rename setup_32.c to setup.c > > The patches between the above two commits are related with X86. When > using git-bisect between the above two commits, we will get the > compiling errors(For example: some files don't exist) or the kernel > panic. So we can't continue using git-bisect to identify which commit > the regression is caused by. If you test SMP kernels on a non-SMP box, that may be http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568. In which case, please test the patch from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568#c46 . Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
