RE: [PATCH] ACPI: Add _PDC object evaluate for VIA.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Question: Where are these PDC bits defined for via CPUs? I mean the bits that we use in intel_pdc are
> defined in an Intel specific document. Just wondering whether the same bit definitions hold good for
> via or we should have a different set of defines?

ditto.
init_intel_pdc() uses Intel vendor specific bits documented in 
ftp://download.intel.com/technology/IAPC/acpi/downloads/30222305.pdf
and coded into include/acpi/pdc_intel.h

If VIA is going to have any different bit definitions, then
we should really create a pdc_via.h.  But if VIA is going to re-use
the bits defined by Intel in a compatible way for the
forseeable future, then probably all we need to do is add a
comment saying that the bits VIA is using have the exact
same meaning as they do for Intel.

thanks,
-Len

ps. I'm delighted to receive a patch from VIA.
Sometimes we run into failures in undocumented VIA chipsets,
perhaps you can help us when we run into those?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux