Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Add _PDC object evaluate for VIA.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Thanks a lot, Ingo! Thanks for your kindly help.

I have revise my patch as following:


////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
[PATCH] ACPI: Add _PDC object evaluate for VIA.

Frome: Louis Qi <louisqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The current routine "arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc" only supports INTEL CPUs.
This patch add support for VIA CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Louis Qi <louisqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

--- 2.6.26.5/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c.orig 2008-09-28 10:18:11.000000000 +0800
+++ 2.6.26.5/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c	2008-09-28 10:18:11.000000000 +0800
@@ -66,6 +66,53 @@ static void init_intel_pdc(struct acpi_p
 	return;
 }

+static void init_via_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	struct acpi_object_list *obj_list;
+	union acpi_object *obj;
+	u32 *buf;
+
+	/* allocate and initialize pdc. It will be used later. */
+	obj_list = kmalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_object_list), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!obj_list)
+		goto err_obj_list;
+
+	obj = kmalloc(sizeof(union acpi_object), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!obj)
+		goto err_obj;
+
+	buf = kmalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!buf)
+		goto err_buf;
+
+	buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
+	buf[1] = 1;
+	buf[2] = 0;
+
+	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
+		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_P_FFH;
+
+	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
+		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
+
+	obj->type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+	obj->buffer.length = 12;
+	obj->buffer.pointer = (u8 *)buf;
+	obj_list->count = 1;
+	obj_list->pointer = obj;
+	pr->pdc = obj_list;
+
+	return;
+
+err_buf:
+	kfree(obj);
+err_obj:
+	kfree(obj_list);
+err_obj_list:
+	printk(KERN_ERR "init_via_pdc: memory allocation failed\n");
+}
+
+
 /* Initialize _PDC data based on the CPU vendor */
 void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 {
@@ -74,6 +121,8 @@ void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct
 	pr->pdc = NULL;
 	if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
 		init_intel_pdc(pr, c);
+	else if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR)
+		init_via_pdc(pr, c);

 	return;
 }
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Ingo Molnar :
just a few minor comments:

* louisqi <louisqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+static void init_via_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	struct acpi_object_list *obj_list;
+	union acpi_object *obj;
+	u32 *buf;
+
+	/* allocate and initialize pdc. It will be used later. */
+	obj_list = kmalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_object_list), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!obj_list) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "Memory allocation error\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	obj = kmalloc(sizeof(union acpi_object), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!obj) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "Memory allocation error\n");
+		kfree(obj_list);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	buf = kmalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!buf) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "Memory allocation error\n");
+		kfree(obj);
+		kfree(obj_list);
+		return;
+	}

error condition cleanliness: it's cleaner to create a single off-line instance of freeing logic, at the end of the function:

...
	[ ... normal path ... ]
	return;

err_obj:
	kfree(obj);
err_obj_list:
	kfree(obj_list);
err:
	printk(KERN_ERR "init_via_pdc: memory allocation error\n");
}

and then after the allocation do:

	if (!obj_list)
		goto err;

etc.

(also note the different style of the printk)

+
+	buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
+	buf[1] = 1;
+	buf[2] = 0;
+
+	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
+		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_P_FFH;
+
+	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
+		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
+
+	obj->type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+	obj->buffer.length = 12;
+	obj->buffer.pointer = (u8 *) buf;

style: no need to put a space between the '(u8 *)' and 'buf'.

+	return;
+}

style: no need to put 'return' at the end of a void function.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux