On Wednesday, 17 of September 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2008-09-17 07:45:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > ACPI specificiation tells us that x_firmware_waking_vector is > > > preffered, and maybe it works better than firmware_waking_vector on > > > some machines. > > > > > > Unfortunately, it does not seem to work on thinkpad x60... but I am > > > not sure if I'm not doing something wrong. > > > > > > Testing/ideas would be welcome. > > > > Well, the spec says that if x_firmware_waking_vector is non-zero, the BIOS is > > supposed to call your wake-up code in Protected Mode ... > > That's why I'm passing physical address of 32-bit code... Well, that should work in theory. The BIOS is supposed to set up 4 GB of flat memory starting from zero before jumping to the wake-up code (at least as far as I understand the spec). However, is your FACS version equal to 1? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
