Re: ACPI suspend: test 64-bit waking vector (was Re: [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> ACPI specificiation tells us that x_firmware_waking_vector is
> preffered, and maybe it works better than firmware_waking_vector on
> some machines.
> 
> Unfortunately, it does not seem to work on thinkpad x60... but I am
> not sure if I'm not doing something wrong.
> 
> Testing/ideas would be welcome.

Well, the spec says that if x_firmware_waking_vector is non-zero, the BIOS is
supposed to call your wake-up code in Protected Mode ...

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux