Re: [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > Well, I read this part of the spec (2.0c, 3.0b) more carefully and it matches
> > what you're saying.  Moreover, my understanding of it is that we should
> > actually _clear_ the 64-bit vector on systems that support it, because
> > otherwise the BIOS is supposed to use it and call the wake-up code in protected
> > mode.
> > 
> > The appended patch is based on this observation.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> > 
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector
> > 
> > According to the ACPI specification 2.0c and later, the 64-bit waking vector
> > should be cleared and the 32-bit waking vector should be used, unless we want
> > the wake-up code to be called by the BIOS in Protected Mode.  Moreover, some
> > systems (for example HP dv5-1004nr) are known to fail to resume if the 64-bit
> > waking vector is used.  Therefore, modify the code to clear the 64-bit waking
> > vector, for FACS version 1 or greater, and set the 32-bit one before suspend.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c |   37 +++++++++++--------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > 
> > @@ -134,20 +132,7 @@ acpi_get_firmware_waking_vector(acpi_phy
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Get the vector */
> > -
> > -	if ((facs->length < 32) || (!(facs->xfirmware_waking_vector))) {
> > -		/*
> > -		 * ACPI 1.0 FACS or short table or optional X_ field is zero
> > -		 */
> > -		*physical_address =
> > -		    (acpi_physical_address) facs->firmware_waking_vector;
> > -	} else {
> > -		/*
> > -		 * ACPI 2.0 FACS with valid X_ field
> > -		 */
> > -		*physical_address =
> > -		    (acpi_physical_address) facs->xfirmware_waking_vector;
> > -	}
> > +	*physical_address = (acpi_physical_address)facs->firmware_waking_vector;
> >  
> >  	return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK);
> >  }
> 
> Actually, I guess we should kill acpi_get_firmware_waking_vector: It
> is completely useless, and it is indeed never used in whole Linux...

Well, it's under '#ifdef 0' anyway, but I wanted it to be consistent with the
code we actually use. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux