On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:00 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > >> So what is the status here, how should we proceed? > >> This isn't applied to any tree yet? > >> IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue > them on > >> the test branch and keep it a while there. > > > > I posted them, got a small amount of feedback and no further acks. I > can > > push them again. > > The problem seems to be that some people report this as a regression. No, the problem we discussed here is not a regression. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658 And the patch just works for the laptops that: 1. without passive trip point 2. with a passive trip point that doesn't help because it is too close to the critical trip point. And it's true that there is a thermal regression reported recently, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281 but IMO, that's another problem and we have not root caused yet. thanks, rui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
