Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
So what is the status here, how should we proceed?
This isn't applied to any tree yet?
IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue them on
the test branch and keep it a while there.
I posted them, got a small amount of feedback and no further acks. I can
push them again.
The problem seems to be that some people report this as a regression.
So either:
- It's not actually an regression but has always been this way.
In this case it's fine to delay.
- It's an regression. Then something must have been changed. Do we know what that is?
If it's really an regression then we need a low-risk fix for .27.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
