On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 05:50 +0800, Moore, Robert wrote: > Here's the patchlist: > > ACPICA: Cleanup macro definition file > ACPICA: Copy dynamically loaded tables to local buffer > ACPICA: Fix warning for 64-bit build > ACPICA: Add check for invalid handle in acpi_get_object_info > ACPICA: Fix memory leak when deleting thermal/processor objects > ACPICA: Allow same ACPI table to be loaded/unloaded more than once > ACPICA: Fix possible memory leak in Unload() operator > ACPICA: Return method arg count from acpi_get_object_info > ACPICA: Fix wrong resource descriptor length for 64-bit build > ACPICA: Fix table compare code, length then data > ACPICA: Update version to 20080701 > ACPICA: Return status from global init function > ACPICA: Add function to decode reference obj types to strings > ACPICA: Improve object conversion error messages > ACPICA: x2APIC support: changes for MADT and SRAT ACPI tables > ACPICA: Add function to dereference returned reference objects > ACPICA: Additional error checking for pathname utilities > ACPICA: Update version to 20080729 > > > Most of these are bug fixes, new stuff would be the following: > > ACPICA: Cleanup macro definition file > ACPICA: Return method arg count from acpi_get_object_info > ACPICA: Add function to decode reference obj types to strings > ACPICA: Improve object conversion error messages > ACPICA: x2APIC support: changes for MADT and SRAT ACPI tables > > > Leaving these as the bug fixes that should be integrated: > > ACPICA: Copy dynamically loaded tables to local buffer > ACPICA: Fix warning for 64-bit build > ACPICA: Add check for invalid handle in acpi_get_object_info > ACPICA: Fix memory leak when deleting thermal/processor objects > ACPICA: Allow same ACPI table to be loaded/unloaded more than once > ACPICA: Fix possible memory leak in Unload() operator > ACPICA: Fix wrong resource descriptor length for 64-bit build > ACPICA: Fix table compare code, length then data > ACPICA: Return status from global init function > ACPICA: Add function to dereference returned reference objects > ACPICA: Additional error checking for pathname utilities Andi, The attachment is the bug fixes as Bob listed above. It can be applied to your linux-acpi-2.6 tree(test branch). Lin Ming > > > I'm not sure what you should do with the version numbers, I don't think > you should advertise a certain version of ACPICA until it has been > *fully* integrated. > > ACPICA: Update version to 20080701 > ACPICA: Update version to 20080729 > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Kleen, Andi > >Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 2:43 PM > >To: Moore, Robert; Lin, Ming M > >Cc: 'linux-acpi'; Brown, Len > >Subject: RE: ACPICA patch set, release 20080701 & 20080729 > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Moore, Robert > >>Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 11:31 PM > >>To: Kleen, Andi; Lin, Ming M > >>Cc: 'linux-acpi'; Brown, Len > >>Subject: RE: ACPICA patch set, release 20080701 & 20080729 > >> > >>>And it's far too late for feature patches at this point. Can you > >>>extract only the bug fixes and non intrusive cleanups? > >> > >>What does this mean exactly? > > > >The Linux kernel has this concept of merging windows. After a major > release > >there is a 2 week merging window where all the features go in. The > merge > >window closes with -rc1. After -rc1 some features can still go in, but > in > >general larger merges are frowned upon (as in Linus often yells at the > >submitter) The focus is definitely on bug fixes post -rc1. Also > >there seem to be unfortunately quite a lot of ACPI regressions this > cycle, > >so I have to be especially conservative. > > > >A full 2 cycle ACPICA merge would be likely too much > >of a merge. Also we need some testing time for major ACPICA changes > >in -mm/linux-next anyways. > > > >I'm open for relatively clear bug fixes and unlikely to break anything > >cleanups though to push in for .27. E.g. the pathname fixes would be > >obvious candidates. Since you know the various patches better than me > >it makes sense for you to preselect. > > > >I can pull full ACPICA into the test tree of course (assuming > >it applies). Will do that tomorrow. But test is beyond .27. > > > >-Andi >
Attachment:
acpica.fixes.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed-tar