Re: Check for ACPI backlight support otherwise use vendor ACPIdrivers - version 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:20:28PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > But when in user mode, brightness keys doesn't do anything either.
> > Echo'ing to /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness doesn't work, but echoing
> > to /sys/class/backlight/thinkpad_screen/brightness works.
> That /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness does not and
> /sys/class/backlight/thinkpad_screen/brightness 
> works is strange, this should be a bug?

I guess so, but I don't really know how to check.

> 
> I wonder whether /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness can be removed soon, people had
> some time to make use of the generic interface.

I'm not using it usually anyway.
> 
> What you describe very much reminds me when I tested on a ThinkPad with an IGD
> device. I removed the check for IGD devices in favour of a working IGD driver.
> 
> Attached patch might help you (with acpi_backlight=vendor)?
> You should be able to apply this on my latest patchset, but use this patch
> instead of the thinkpad_acpi one.

Ok, will try tonight. But I remember Henrique saying my thinkpad
shouldnt use thinkpad-acpi but rather video.ko for brightness
management, so I'm a bit puzzled.

> > Cat'ing /proc/acpi/events still gives:
> > video LCD0 00000086 00000000
> > video LCD0 00000087 00000000
> >
> > At one time I get the 750ms delay, but I don't have the
> > ibm/hotkey HKEY 00000080 00005010 at all.
> Hmm, on my machine it was 1010 and 1011 key event values for up/down
> brightness. If you do not see those, the patch might not work.

And I do remember that the key changed (but can't remember when). Maybe
that's due to a bios upgrade.

> > In X, same thing, no brightness keys, but xbacklight does work in
> > standard mode (“kernel”).
> >
> > (btw it seems my mails don't reach linux-acpi, I don't really know why
> > and postmaster don't answer, maybe they didn't have my mail either).
> 
> I expect you have an IGD device and this should by default be served by
> Matthew's/Hong's patches. Matthew said something about a needed peace
> that came in in latest BIOSes? But I expect you already run on the latest?

I run Bios 2.19 and EC 1.08 which are the latest available on
lenovo.com.

The kernel I'm testing on is a pure linux-acpi-2.6/test so i'm not sure
I have Matthew's patches.

Cheers,
-- 
Yves-Alexis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux