>If you are at that, do you think it makes sense to intruduce a GPE >bit? How about something a bit more generic - ACPI_DB_EVENTS. This could be used for both the fixed events and the GPEs. >-----Original Message----- >From: Thomas Renninger [mailto:trenn@xxxxxxx] >Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 2:59 AM >To: Moore, Robert >Cc: ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, >Rui >Subject: Re: Debug interface used for error message cleanups > >On Wednesday 30 July 2008 22:29:19 Moore, Robert wrote: >> I'm going to go ahead and remove these from ACPICA. >> >> We added an "obsolete" warning in the header file some time ago, and I >> think the time has come to remove them, especially in light of these >> patches to Linux. > >Great thanks. >If you are at that, do you think it makes sense to intruduce a GPE >bit? >Just leaving it unused for now? > >I didn't play with these much yet, Rui, do you think this makes sense? The >fact there were several sever problems recently and GPEs possibly >must get debugged by people writting other device drivers who do not know >and do not want to know about the output of the other debug flags I thought >this could make sense. > >Just an idea..., > > Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
