* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Len seems to think that Rafael seems to think that Ingo seems to think > that this patch broke one of his boxes. > > Is it so? No! :-) it found a pre-existing suspend+resume breakage on a testbox. (I.e. the debug patch worked as i'd expect it to work. Every good debug patch starts its lifetime with a sharp spike of breakages it finds.) ( my kernel test-setup does in excess of 100,000 random kernel bootups per year and me not having to hit the keyboard or close+open the lid a hundred thousand times, day and night, to find the occasional suspend+resume regression is a not to be under-estimated plus. ) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html