It's a configuration option, at least for the main tables in the RSDT/XSDT. Perhaps not extended to the loaded tables, I will have to look. >-----Original Message----- >From: Len Brown [mailto:lenb@xxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:46 PM >To: Moore, Robert >Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: table checksum issues > >Bob, >I thought you mentioned the other day that >we never discard a table due to a checksum error. >But here is an example of us discarding an SSDT >with a bad checksum (and causing cpufreq not to work). > >http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10513 > >Did I mis-understand you? >Do you think we should not ignore tables w/ bad checksums >in order to be "bug compatible"? > >thanks, >-Len -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
