Bob, I thought you mentioned the other day that we never discard a table due to a checksum error. But here is an example of us discarding an SSDT with a bad checksum (and causing cpufreq not to work). http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10513 Did I mis-understand you? Do you think we should not ignore tables w/ bad checksums in order to be "bug compatible"? thanks, -Len -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
