On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:02:37 -0400
Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:09:07PM +0800, Yuquan Wang wrote:
> > @@ -441,6 +441,11 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> > start = cfmws->base_hpa;
> > end = cfmws->base_hpa + cfmws->window_size;
> >
> > + if (srat_disabled()) {
> > + pr_err("SRAT is missing or bad while processing CFMWS.\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
>
> I thought the srat was optional regardless of the presence of a CFMWS.
> Is this not the case?
True in theory, but do we want to support it?
I'd vote no unless someone is shipping such a system and can't fix it up.
Jonathan
>
> ~Gregory
>
