On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:09:07PM +0800, Yuquan Wang wrote:
> @@ -441,6 +441,11 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> start = cfmws->base_hpa;
> end = cfmws->base_hpa + cfmws->window_size;
>
> + if (srat_disabled()) {
> + pr_err("SRAT is missing or bad while processing CFMWS.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
I thought the srat was optional regardless of the presence of a CFMWS.
Is this not the case?
~Gregory
