2023年11月7日 00:09，Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道：
>
> +static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, bool first_pass,
> struct acpi_device **adev_p)
> {
> struct acpi_device *device = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle);
> @@ -2054,9 +2059,25 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
> if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle))
> return AE_OK;
>
> - /* Bail out if there are dependencies. */
> - if (acpi_scan_check_dep(handle, check_dep) > 0)
> - return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
> + if (first_pass) {
> + acpi_mipi_check_crs_csi2(handle);
> +
> + /* Bail out if there are dependencies. */
> + if (acpi_scan_check_dep(handle) > 0) {
> + /*
> + * The entire CSI-2 connection graph needs to be
> + * extracted before any drivers or scan handlers
> + * are bound to struct device objects, so scan
> + * _CRS CSI-2 resource descriptors for all
> + * devices below the current handle.
> + */
> + acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, handle,
> + ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> + acpi_scan_check_crs_csi2_cb,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
> + }
> + }
>
> fallthrough;
> case ACPI_TYPE_ANY: /* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */
>
Hi, I'd like to report some issues caused by this patch. Correct me if I'm wrong
since I'm not expert on ACPI. Before this patch, properties of ACPI devices with
_DEP relationship declared were evaluated after the initialization of the
depending devices, i.e. the execution of handler->attach(). With this patch,
_CRS of all the ACPI devices are evaluated to check if the device contains a
CSI2 resource, regardless of the declaration of _DEP relationship. The
evaluation of _CRS is even before _STA and other methods indicating the status
of the device.
This has caused some issues in certain scenarios, where the DSDT contains legacy
devices, which requires reading IO ports to form the result of its _CRS. An
example of such a legacy device is declared in the DSDT is as below:
Device (LPT)
{
Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0400") /* Standard LPT Parallel Port */)
Name (_UID, 0x02) // _UID: Unique ID
Name (_DDN, "LPT1") // _DDN: DOS Device Name
Name (_DEP, Package (0x01) // _DEP: Dependencies
{
\_SB.PCI0
})
OperationRegion (ITE1, SystemIO, 0x2E, 0x02)
Field (ITE1, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve) {INDX, 8, DATA, 8}
IndexField (INDX, DATA, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
// Omitting some declarations of fields
IOAH, 8,
IOAL, 8,
}
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
Name (BUF0, ResourceTemplate ()
{
IO (Decode16,
0x0378, // Range Minimum
0x0378, // Range Maximum
0x01, // Alignment
0x08, // Length
_Y01)
IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Exclusive, _Y02)
{7}
})
CreateByteField (BUF0, \LPT._CRS._Y01._MIN, IOLO)
CreateByteField (BUF0, 0x03, IOHI)
CreateByteField (BUF0, \LPT._CRS._Y01._MAX, IORL)
CreateByteField (BUF0, 0x05, IORH)
CreateByteField (BUF0, \LPT._CRS._Y01._LEN, LEN1)
CreateByteField (BUF0, \LPT._CRS._Y02._INT, IRQL)
IOLO = IOAL /* \LPT_.IOAL */
IORL = IOAL /* \LPT_.IOAL */
IOHI = IOAH /* \LPT_.IOAH */
IORH = IOAH /* \LPT_.IOAH */
// Omitting some assignments and calculations
Return (BUF0)
}
}
On non-x86 platforms, IO ports are implemented using MMIO. The memory is
remapped in the initialization of the PCI root, using its QWordIO resource
declared in its _CRS, in acpi_pci_root_remap_iospace(). Before the
initialization of the PCI root, reads and writes of the IO ports will result in
accessing memory region which is not mapped.
Before this patch, adding a _DEP of Package(){PCI0} to these legacy devices will
postpone the initialization of these devices after the PCI root, solving the
above problem. After this patch, however, the evaluation of _CRS regardless of
_DEP declarations causes accessing IO ports before they are ready.
I've checked the ACPI spec, and it states that ``OSPM must guarantee that the
following operation regions are always accessible: SystemIO operation regions"
and ``Since the region types above are permanently available, no _REG methods
are required, nor will OSPM evaluate any _REG methods that appear in the same
scope as the operation region declaration(s) of these types". It seems that
from the view of the AML codes in the DSDT, it can never know when the IO ports
are ready, and it is impossible for Linux on non-x86 platforms to ensure IO
ports are always accessible.
I wonder if there would be a better solution to this problem.
Cheers,
Miao Wang
