Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Update the documentation for EINJv2 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:44:47PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:34:29PM -0700, Zaid Alali wrote:
> > +  # cd /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj
> > +  # cat available_error_type			# See which errors can be injected
> > +  0x00000002	Processor Uncorrectable non-fatal
> > +  0x00000008	Memory Correctable
> > +  0x00000010	Memory Uncorrectable non-fatal
> > +  0x00000001	EINJV2 Processor Error
> > +  0x00000002	EINJV2 Memory Error
> 
> This seems confusing to me. Is 0x00000002 the code for a V1 processor
> uncorrectable, or a V2 memory error? It seems that the "error_type" file
> is interpreted differently depending on what is written to the "flags"
> file.

Maybe the confusion would be removed if the "error_type"
file is changed from using a hex number to using a string
which the einj driver parses.

Hex values are parsed as before as legacy EINJ types. To specify
a V2 EINJ type the user does:

# echo V2_0x2 > error_type

and EINJ driver then knows to treat the code as a V2 type (instead
of using a bit written to the flags file).

For consistency the available_error_type would show the V2_ prefix

# cat available_error_type                       # See which errors can be injected
0x00000002	Processor Uncorrectable non-fatal
0x00000008	Memory Correctable
0x00000010	Memory Uncorrectable non-fatal
V2_0x00000001	EINJV2 Processor Error
V2_0x00000002	EINJV2 Memory Error

-Tony





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux