Re: [PATCH 7/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Optimize amd_pstate_update_limits()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/27/2024 11:57, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 04:13:57PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>

Don't take and release the mutex when prefcore isn't present and
avoid initialization of variables that will be initially set
in the function.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>

---
  drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 10 +++++-----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
index 75568d0f84623..ed05d7a0add10 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
@@ -798,17 +798,17 @@ static void amd_pstate_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
  	int ret;
  	bool highest_perf_changed = false;
- mutex_lock(&amd_pstate_driver_lock);
-	if ((!amd_pstate_prefcore) || (!cpudata->hw_prefcore))
-		goto free_cpufreq_put;
+	if (!amd_pstate_prefcore)
+		return;

Looks good to me.

Wondering if it is worth maintaining a static key for
amd_pstate_prefcore. Anyway it doesn't change after boot.

As there is a kernel command line option how would you pass the early param parsing result over without a static variable?


Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!


--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux