Hi Hans, On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:45 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > On 8/13/24 12:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:46 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > > > > [cut] > > > >> > >> The reporter of 2302253 has reported that the patches from: > >> > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-ec-fixes > >> > >> resolve the issue; and as mentioned before the reporter of 2298938 > >> is not responsive atm. So I believe that with it confirmed that this > >> at least fixes the issues on the LG Gram laptops (1) these patches are > >> ready to be merged now. > > > > Thanks for the information! > > > > I'll go ahead and put them into linux-next. > > Great. Question is the intention for these to go to Linus > in the 6.12 cycle, or do you just want to let them bake > a bit in linux-next and then plan to send them as a fix > for the 6.11 cycle ? > > The reason I'm asking is because the patches these replace > cause a regression on some laptops models starting with 6.9.7 > and also all 6.10.y kernels (and if you wait till 6.12, > also all 6.11.y) kernels. > > So although this is a somewhat bigger change my personal > preference would be for these to get send out as fixes > and backported to kernels >= 6.9 (1). Yes, that's my plan. > 1) Just like how the patches they replace end up getting > backported to 6.9.7 > > > > > > >> 1) And based on dmesg with a regressed kernel likely / hopefully also > >> the issue from RH bugzilla 2298938. > >> > > >
