Hi Rafael, On 8/13/24 12:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:46 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> > > [cut] > >> >> The reporter of 2302253 has reported that the patches from: >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-ec-fixes >> >> resolve the issue; and as mentioned before the reporter of 2298938 >> is not responsive atm. So I believe that with it confirmed that this >> at least fixes the issues on the LG Gram laptops (1) these patches are >> ready to be merged now. > > Thanks for the information! > > I'll go ahead and put them into linux-next. Great. Question is the intention for these to go to Linus in the 6.12 cycle, or do you just want to let them bake a bit in linux-next and then plan to send them as a fix for the 6.11 cycle ? The reason I'm asking is because the patches these replace cause a regression on some laptops models starting with 6.9.7 and also all 6.10.y kernels (and if you wait till 6.12, also all 6.11.y) kernels. So although this is a somewhat bigger change my personal preference would be for these to get send out as fixes and backported to kernels >= 6.9 (1). Regards, Hans 1) Just like how the patches they replace end up getting backported to 6.9.7 > >> 1) And based on dmesg with a regressed kernel likely / hopefully also >> the issue from RH bugzilla 2298938. >> >
