On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:25:27 +0100, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:27 +0100 > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > v10: > > - Make acpi_processor_set_per_cpu() return 0 / error rather than bool > > to simplify error handling at the call sites. > > (Thanks to both Rafael and Gavin who commented on this) > > - Gather tags. > > - Rebase on v6.10-rc1 > > > > The approach to the GICv3 changes stablized very late in the 6.10 cycle. > > Subject to Marc taking a final look at those, I think we are now > > in a good state wrt to those and the ACPI parts. The remaining code > > that hasn't received review tags from the relevant maintainers > > is the arm64 specific arch_register_cpu(). Given I think this will go > > through the arm64 tree, hopefully they have just been waiting for > > everything else to be ready. > > Marc, Will, Catalin, > > Any comments on this series? We definitely want to finally land this > in 6.11! > > Marc, in practice I think you already gave feedback on the the GICv3 > changes in here as part of the discussions in the earlier version threads, > but if you have time for a final glance through it would be much appreciated. > Thanks for all your earlier help on this btw. I've had a quick look and the GICv3 parts look OK to me (you should now have by tags for both patches). Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
