On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:03:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:58:26PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: > > On 5/2/24 17:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: ... > > >> This macro has been tested with a patch series that has not been > > >> applied yet and is under discussion in input [1], which makes use of the > > >> non-scoped version of the loop. > > > > > > So, why should we apply a dead code? > > > > I will add this patch to the series I mentioned, so there is a first use > > case. > > Sounds like a good plan. Ah, note that IIO has already some patches against device property APIs. Maybe it's already done by Jonathan. Cc'ed to him. > > Even if the _available variant is preferred, the other one is more > > widely used, and having a scoped version will allow for safer code. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
