On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:58:26PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: > On 5/2/24 17:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: ... > >> This macro has been tested with a patch series that has not been > >> applied yet and is under discussion in input [1], which makes use of the > >> non-scoped version of the loop. > > > > So, why should we apply a dead code? > > I will add this patch to the series I mentioned, so there is a first use > case. Sounds like a good plan. > Even if the _available variant is preferred, the other one is more > widely used, and having a scoped version will allow for safer code. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
