On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:57:30PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > >> If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then > >> there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from > >> arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am > >> wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug. > >> > > > > My understanding is maybe it just wants to expose explicit logs to > > avoid any potential bugs from FW or Kernel. > > There are lots of ACPI enabled systems that aren't NUMA (single > socket servers, desktops, laptops). Making this "pr_info()" would just > add noise to the boot on all of those. > Exactly. But this is an existing pr_info message across architectures. My suggestion is to add one more patch in this series to convert this to pr_debug unless someone has strong reason to keep it pr_info. Thanks, Sunil
