On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:18 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Haibo, > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:47:58PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > > Enable ACPI based NUMA for RISCV in Kconfig. > > > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > index 0bfcfec67ed5..0fb55f166701 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ config NUMA > > select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA > > select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK > > select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK > > + select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI > > If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then > there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from > arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am > wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug. > My understanding is maybe it just wants to expose explicit logs to avoid any potential bugs from FW or Kernel. > Thanks, > Sunil > > select OF_NUMA > > select USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID > > help > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >
