On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:28 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > We actually can get away without defining a new IRQ flag, as in > > the patch below. > > > > It is not super-clean, but should do the work. > > > > Linus, what do you think? > > Uhhh I rather not, the other approach will cover the invariably recurring > instances of this, it will not be the last time we see something like this. I'm not actually sure how likely this is. The ACPI SCI is generally heavy-wieght, so it is not shared very often (and I believe that there is a particular reason for sharing it with a GPIO chip) and this very well may be an exception. > We need tglx input on this, I could merge the patch below with some > big TODO to fix it properly if the discussion about the proper solution > takes too much time. > > But I rather not hack around with IRQs without tglx (or marcz, but he > got overloaded) input. Fair enough. I guess I'll post the first patch with a proper changelog next week and we'll see. Thanks!
