On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We actually can get away without defining a new IRQ flag, as in > the patch below. > > It is not super-clean, but should do the work. > > Linus, what do you think? Uhhh I rather not, the other approach will cover the invariably recurring instances of this, it will not be the last time we see something like this. We need tglx input on this, I could merge the patch below with some big TODO to fix it properly if the discussion about the proper solution takes too much time. But I rather not hack around with IRQs without tglx (or marcz, but he got overloaded) input. Yours, Linus Walleij
