On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The original code executed platform_pci_choose_state() first, if defined, and > if that succeeded, it just returned the result. You put > platform_pci_choose_state() under the switch(). :-) For FREEZE and QUIESCE, is there ever any reason to leave D0? These calls are documented as not requiring (and not desiring!) any change in power level. > Consequently, the 'state' argument would simply be unnecessary (and in fact > it's ignored if platform_pci_choose_state() is defined). It should not be ignored, for the reason given above. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
