> What GIT tree is this patch based on? I don't see this log_arm_hw_error() > function in drivers/ras/ras.c upstream, or in intel-next. Thirty seconds after hitting SEND, I see I was looking at the wrong GIT tree. This code is based on upstream. Ooops. > Should ARM specific code like this be in a file with "arm" in its name? Or at least > be inside some #ifdef CONFIG_ARM. But I stand by this part. -Tony
